Editor’s Note: Political commentator Muriuki Magiri argues that Deputy President Kithure Kindiki’s political choices have deepened divisions within Mt Kenya, raising fundamental questions about leadership, loyalty, historical memory, and the enduring tension between political expediency and principled statesmanship.
In my view, the Mt Kenya East versus Mt Kenya West narrative did not emerge by accident.
It has been nurtured by the political choices and messaging of Deputy President Kithure Kindiki and President William Ruto, whose approach appears to thrive on internal divisions rather than collective purpose.
What is most troubling is the perception that Prof. Kindiki has been willing to subordinate the broader interests of his community to political expediency.
History is replete with leaders who traded enduring principles for immediate advantage, only to discover that power gained at the expense of conviction is seldom respected for long.
Leadership demands more than loyalty to a superior; it requires loyalty to truth, justice, and the people one serves.
Critics such as Rigathi Gachagua have long portrayed Prof Kindiki as a leader reluctant to challenge the president.
Whether fair or not, the deputy president’s recent political posture has done little to dispel that perception.
A statesman earns respect not by echoing power but by speaking uncomfortable truths when circumstances demand it.
A scholar of Prof. Kindiki’s stature should also appreciate the historical foundations of the renewed GEMA and Mt Kenya political consciousness.
Gachagua orders his troops to drop attacks on DP Kindiki. pic.twitter.com/vuPixnTKJo
— Citizen TV Kenya (@citizentvkenya) July 21, 2026
Much of it was shaped by the trauma and political lessons of the 2007–08 post-election violence.
Political identity in the region did not develop in a vacuum; it evolved from a desire for security, representation, and collective bargaining.
Ignoring those realities risks misunderstanding the very forces shaping contemporary politics.
His recent appeals for Mt Kenya unity may sound reassuring, yet many remain unconvinced because they see a disconnect between those words and the political alliances and strategies surrounding him.
To such critics, unity cannot simply be proclaimed; it must be reflected in consistent actions that build trust rather than deepen suspicion.
Ultimately, the proper response to political disagreements is not violence or intimidation but the ballot.
Citizens possess the sovereign power to reward leaders who unite and to reject those they believe have failed to uphold the public trust.
If Prof Kindiki truly wishes to redefine his political legacy, history offers many examples of leaders who chose principle over office.
READ ALSO: President Ruto Is Right: ODM Zoning Must Fall – Let the People Decide
Former President Mwai Kibaki’s resignation from late President Daniel Arap Moi’s government in 1991 remains one such illustration of political conviction.
Prof Kindiki may choose to remain in President Ruto’s administration; that is his constitutional right, but he should exercise restraint and remember that political fortunes are temporary, while reputation endures.
Power comes and goes; character is what history remembers.
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the position of GOTTA.news. We welcome writers to give their views on various social issues. Send your opinion to info@gotta.news.
